Program Build Anomaly Review Continuous Control Monitoring
Description
Monitor key control points for program build anomaly review; flag missing approvals, SoD conflicts, late postings, or incomplete evidence before month-end close. The MVP would connect NGRMS, FYDP, budget exhibits, PBIS-like submissions, congressional marks, prior-year execution and produce read-only recommendations for OUSD(C), Service FM, Program/Budget offices.
AI / analytics pattern
process mining + rules + ML
Automation level / stage
continuous assurance
Expected benefit
More timely control issue detection, reduced repeat findings, stronger ongoing assurance.
Audit / financial statement impact
Statement of Budgetary Resources; budgetary note disclosures
Controls / human review
Human review for unusual/high-dollar items; policy citations; audit logs; role-based access; periodic accuracy testing.
Data needed
NGRMS, FYDP, budget exhibits, PBIS-like submissions, congressional marks, prior-year execution; master/reference data; audit logs; policy/control requirements; prior exceptions; relevant document evidence.
Possible metrics
control exceptions detected before close; SoD conflicts remediated; repeat findings reduced
MVP scope
Start with one Component/reporting entity and one subprocess (program build anomaly review) for two close/audit cycles; read-only outputs first.
Related material weakness / control objective
Funds control, budgetary resource accuracy, decision support