OMB Individually Reported

Open-Source Intelligence for Lead Identification and Targeting

Medium riskExact public inventory row

Description

The AI is intended to solve the problem of traditional manual open‑source searches missing relevant identifiers or connections in large volumes of online information.

Detailed example

The platform utilizes AI modules to assist ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) in open-source research and investigations. The risk extraction capability uses AI to identify and classify potential risks within documents, such as references to criminal activity or connections to organizations of concern, and generates structured annotations for analysts to review. The platform also includes AI-powered translation, which allows analysts to work with multilingual content, and image analysis, which detects and extracts objects from images linked to documents to provide additional investigative context. Additionally, the system can analyze language within documents to highlight text that may indicate threats or planned violence, drawing attention to sections that require closer examination. An AI chat interface further supports analysts by enabling real-time, conversational queries and responses, making it easier to surface insights and context from large datasets.

AI / analytics pattern

Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.

Automation level / stage

a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.

Expected benefit

The platform’s AI capabilities reduce the time and effort required to sift through large datasets, improve the ability to uncover relevant information, and enhance the overall efficiency and effectiveness of ICE enforcement operations.

Audit / financial statement impact

This use case falls into a presumptive high-impact category due to its role in supporting law enforcement activities, specifically in identifying individuals who pose risks to community safety or violate U.S. immigration laws. However, it does not meet the definition of high-impact AI as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-21 because its outputs do not serve as a "principal basis" for decisions or actions with legal, material, binding, or significant effects on an individual or entity's civil rights, civil liberties, or privacy; or human health and safety. The AI modules, including risk extraction, image analysis, language detection, and AI chat, are designed to augment traditional investigative processes by providing structured annotations and insights for analysts to review. These outputs are explicitly described as supporting tools that require human validation and integration with other government data holdings before any enforcement action is taken. Furthermore, the AI system operates as a supplementary tool, consolidating and organizing information to enhance efficiency, but does not independently produce outcomes that directly affect civil rights, civil liberties, or privacy. The safeguards in place, including human validation and adherence to established legal standards, ensure that the AI outputs remain supportive rather than determinative, confirming that this use case does not meet the high-impact definition.

Controls / human review

ATO: Not reported; PIA: Not published